What server set up you would use to send 500/to 600k daily
- Thread starter Napoolion
- Start date
frm.mwz
Well-Known Member
You can use all the solid third party DS, e.g. amazonses, sendgrid, etc. Some mwz users send several million a day with them, though it might be wise to calculate the cost/month of the total delivery incl postmastery
Hey @Napoolion, my dear friend @frm.mwz has suggested you absolutely correct thing
You can use any existing ESP in the market like amazonses, sendgrid, etc. to not face any deliverability issues. Because getting your own server ready via me is very easy but sometime hard to maintain if you don't have OPT-IN subscribers
You can use any existing ESP in the market like amazonses, sendgrid, etc. to not face any deliverability issues. Because getting your own server ready via me is very easy
but sometime hard to maintain if you don't have OPT-IN subscribers 
bidorbuy
Member
I am not sure why there is relevance to the number of IPs. It really depends on the MTA. In our case we use Port25 and can push out about 260-400K messages per hour. This is on a 8-core, 10GB linux box (no SSD) etc (we use 4 IPs for marketing mails and the below are our marketing stats):
Code:
Traffic ------------inbound------------ ------------outbound-----------
rcpts msgs kbytes rcpts msgs kbytes
Total 4737749 4733986 224730775.8 4737444 4737366 227577040.2
Last Hour 3307 3303 57221.0 3988 3988 129181.2
Top/Hour 269617 269598 24183000.8 268337 268337 24061199.5
Last Min. 42 42 583.9 36 36 527.6
Top/Min. 29833 29833 1314417.8 15971 15971 756740.8
Ibrahim Sharif
Member
This is one of My Current Server.
I have throttled the sending speed and have a dedicated /25 Block -128 IP
i have tested it to 300k a day
I never Got any of MxToolbox Blacklists.
Server is on a 32 GB RAM, 1TB NVMe RAIDed for server failure and email backups.
Sending and accepting from remote MTA depends on IP reputation.
I just Shared my experience
Niko
Active Member
@Ibrahim Sharif you achieved that by smtp of pickup?
Ibrahim Sharif
Member
Didn't understand Your "PICKUP" method clearly
Niko
Active Member
By pickup directory
Ibrahim Sharif
Member
I use my Infrustructers in 2 Parts mainly. Dedicated SMTP server and Remote Database server of 64 GB RAM to maintain all Campaigns reports there and no lag and risk of maintenance.
This means I use "Relay method" right?
frm.mwz
Well-Known Member
So mwz is on a third server? What dbf server do you use? And which ones have you tested? Is it next to the mwz server or far away?
Is splitting the database significantly faster? But does it take longer to pull the data for whole camp reports? And with risk of maintenance you mean no risk of loosing data or dbf integrity when deleting the logs or what?
Relay usually means sending via third party delivery server.
Ibrahim Sharif
Member
yes MW is on remote Server and i connect from remote to my SMTPs. MySQL format. both local MW and Remote MW tested and Remote is safer and painless.
i just use high ram and remote server to keep safe MW database. and while SMTP maintenance or any other issue dont harm main campaign reports.
i forgot to include one thing.
I HAVE A DEDICATED 16 IP NAMESERVER FOR DNS HOSTING ONLY.
It is really helpful when you use 100+ Domains in your hands and keep more safe.
Yes. MY SMTP servers like Relay.i can use any 3rd party to connect to it from any app,script and be able to send emails with DKIM sigining .
frm.mwz
Well-Known Member
Seems you have a good setup!
Especially the nameserver part, which might help avoid problems with over-burdened registrars
From what you wrote it seems you have split the database, if so, does it make things faster?
Have you tried with Amazon Aurora? It can handle databases up to 4TB size (last time checked) and is super-duper fast
Ibrahim Sharif
Member
Yes when i faced that only 1 IP caused 2 days of hardwork what happened and all of my Fresh Domains showed i am blacklisted then i build this DNS server to cover this issue. No mailing no black things or even White things from those IP, Just Domain Parking Lot. when i need to use separate server for any domain i just Transfer that part of DNS to my new Server.Seems you have a good setup!
Especially the nameserver part, which might help avoid problems with over-burdened registrars
Of course Faster !. My previous and almost 95%+ PMTA server installers,maintainers setup all things on same server. this cause serious trouble. I heard that Sometimes Database got corrupted and All reports vanished.the whole thing then was broken.
Then i thought about splitting tasks and getting safe!
MySQL Clustering is great way for simple People like me
Didn't try yet Amzons Servers. My Servers DISK TYPE is NVMe and RAIDED for 1 DISK FAILURE. so if main disk fails then the backup disk will run from same state. Same size 2 NVMe Disks to run the server.Have you tried with Amazon Aurora? It can handle databases up to 4TB size (last time checked) and is super-duper fast
From about 50M sendings and with 5M Users i saw total Disk Space was 48GB*** [ df -h] all partitions collectively.
To expand partition Sizes and saving some pains in future i suggest to increase /var partitions for RedHAT and CentOS users. /home is enough 100GB for SMTP handler servers.
Ibrahim Sharif
Member
frm.mwz
Well-Known Member
You mean it gives the domains a clean rep before they get used?
Yeah, that is an F-
There are even some who install a control panel with pmta and several mailers and landing pages on one small vps, crazy (or super small lists)!
Yup, they r gr8
Real scalability on the fly is hard to find:
http://selbielabs.com/cloud-platforms-compared/
https://thehftguy.com/2016/06/08/ch...vs-linode-vs-digitalocean-vs-ovh-vs-hertzner/
Where did you split the database (which tables in which part)?
Ibrahim Sharif
Member
Its actually saving any harm from Hosted IP and relaxing All Mailer Domains to multiple IPs
Ibrahim Sharif
Member
The List Subscribers, Delivery Logs , and all others in 3 parts
frm.mwz
Well-Known Member
Interesting approach, so the subs are on the mwz server, the ds logs remote on a 2nd server, and the rest remote on a 3rd server?